🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The company is attempting modifications of a draft bill that include lowering the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

International corporate influence worries

This occurs during broader worries about industry interference with health policies. In recent weeks, WHO officials raised concerns that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN summit conference,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, the corporation proposes this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a warning should cover at least half of the front of a pack “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “specific rules can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We exist in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and collect the yield and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself complete moral failure.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The corporate communicator commented: “The corporation runs its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which allow for relevant group engagement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not resisting legislation”, they said, mentioning that minors should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to accomplish desired public health goals, while accepting the variety of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the corporation's recommendations “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which encompasses increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.