🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he endured defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach came at the executive and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of one of the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to regard him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, Jason Wilcox has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which United’s competitors are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over System & Ideology

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after having been part of the hierarchy that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Perhaps in time he might agree to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate on a plane beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being ready to receive.

An Ultimate Power In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be decided in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the signing of a new striker?

A New Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and energy to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys established? What number of mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who will adapt their methods accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Game: Accountability for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for playing too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then bin him for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.